Reduced tillage trials aim to improve soil sustainability

River Wensum DTC Research Update 2

Resource explained

An update from research undertaken as part of the Demonstration Test Catchments (DTCs) research platform established by Defra to investigate the extent by which on-farm mitigation measures can cost-effectively reduce the impact of diffuse water pollution on river ecology whilst maintaining food production capacity. One of the DTCs was the River Wensum in Norfolk. This update describes a 5-year reduced cultivation trial that took place at the Salle Park Estate, Norfolk, to assess the impact of contrasting tillage regimes on the biological, chemical and physical condition of soils. Non-inversion tillage methods can reduce soil erosion, increase organic matter content, improve drainage and water holding capacity and increase microbial and earthworm activity. However, the lack of inversion can also increase pest populations and lead to an accumulation of nutrients near the soil surface which can pose a risk to freshwater environments. This update describes the trials and outlines observations and results in relation to bulk density, organic carbon, nutrients, leaching losses, soil biology and economics.

Findings & recommendations

  • In 9 fields covering 143 hectares of arable land, 3 contrasting tillage regimes were established; conventional mouldboard ploughing to 25cm depth, shallow non-inversion to 10cm depth using the disks and tines of a Väderstad Topdown and Carrier; and direct drilling with zero inversion using a Väderstad Seed Hawkdirect drill. All were in a rotation of spring bean, winter wheat, winter barley, oilseed rape and winter wheat.
  • Reduced tillage did not significantly impact the soil bulk density (an indicator of soil compaction).
  • Whilst soil organic carbon did increase under direct drill, the fact it also increased under plough suggests this was not related to the tillage method and it was concluded that overall, reduced tillage did not significantly improve soil organic carbon content.
  • Reduced cultivation did not significantly alter soil nutrient status when compared to conventional ploughing or have significant impact on nutrient leaching losses.
  • Against expectations, average earthworm populations were larger under the plough-based system in clay loam, sandy loam and sandy silt loam soils than either of the reduced tillage blocks. Only in sandy clay loam soils were earthworm numbers marginally higher under direct drill.
  • There was an 8% increase in profit margin under shallow non inversion tillage compared to direct drilling.

Find out more about the Wensum Alliance and project outputs here.

 

 

 

Summary provided by:

Janie Caldbeck

Related articles

Cover crops help to reduce diffuse water pollution

An update from research undertaken as part of the Demonstration Test Catchments research platform established to investigate the extent by which on-farm mitigation measures can...

Crop Protection in Reduced Tillage Systems

Pest, weed and disease management in reduced tillage cropping systems; factors to consider and actions you can take.

Economic and ecological benefits of reduced tillage in the UK

A guide to potential benefits and implications of integrating reduced tillage into your farm management system.

Practical recommendations on reduced tillage systems

Video footage of a member of the TILMAN-ORG project outlining some of the problems and potential solutions associated with reduced tillage.

The effects of reduced tillage practices and organic material additions on the carbon content of arable soils

A report summarising results from a review which looks at the extent by which reduced tillage practices and organic material returns could increase the organic...

Living Mulches – Technical Guide

This Agricology technical guide is designed to support farmers in making informed decisions about adopting living mulches in arable systems.
To top