Biodiversity for the Future of Fruit Farming?

Resource explained

The objectives of Kent fruit grower David Butler’s Nuffield Farming Scholarship study tour were ‘To obtain any global ideas or strategies which biodiversity could aid in replacing chemical applications in commercial fruit farming.’ This report summarises his findings from his visits to growers, research centres, agronomists, tree and plant nurseries, vineyards / wineries, universities, packhouses, and machinery manufacturers in Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, New Zealand, Australia, UK and Chile. He set out to see if it is possible to maintain good yielding orchards with a high percentage of class one fruit to feed an ever-growing population, while reducing a proportion of chemical inputs with biological control. The report takes us through the tour, country by country, followed by the changes he made on his farm on return. It ends with discussion, reflections and some home truths.

Please accept statistics, marketing cookies to watch this video.

Findings & recommendations

    Netherlands

    • Highly technical glasshouse top fruit production (Wageningen) enables climate control and high yields without pesticides, but at prohibitively high costs.
    • Taking land out of production for wildflower mixtures/habitat for beneficials within or close to orchards has real potential.

    New Zealand

    • Growers recycle the rootstocks of trees by grafting rather than grubbing and replacing, therefore not disturbing the soil when creating a new orchard.

    Chile

    • The use of cover crops can be targeted to combat specific nutritional deficiencies or pest issues i.e. drilling mustard into blueberry plantations to combat nematodes.
    • Some trees, bushes or plants are added to the ends of fruit rows to host beneficial insects that will predate on pests.

    Back on the farm

    • In conjunction with the Bumblebee Conservation Trust, he has adopted techniques to benefit bumblebees and other pollinators (seeding wild flowers in field margins and corners, cobnut rows providing shelter for natural predators, leaving grass unmown under pears between April and just before harvest, allowing nettles to grow, using moveable bumblebee planters).

    Discussion

    • The initiatives he has adopted have environmental benefits but also costs without any financial value in compensation, and in a harsh financial climate they have been shelved, for now.
    • “It’s great to be green but you must not be in the red.”

Summary provided by:

Phil Sumption

Edited by:

Janie Caldbeck

Related articles

Perennial flower strips for pest control in fruit orchards

This article, adapted from a technical guide published as part of the EcoOrchard project, looks at advantages of sown flower strips, management considerations, costs, and...

A Practical Guide to Integrated Pest Management

This guide from the Nature Friendly Farming Network covers the principles and practice of Integrated Pest Management with case studies and examples of actions.

CROPROTECT Information Database

Croprotect; Rothamsted Research’s knowledge exchange system allowing growers to access tailored advice on Integrated Pest Management (IPM).

IPMWORKS Resource Toolbox

The Toolbox is an interactive, online library of IPM resources designed for farmers and advisors and is available in multiple languages.

It’s not just about the bees

Organic vegetable farmer Andy Dibben puts forward the case for allowing complex insect ecosystems to develop or be proactively encouraged on farms, describing ways in...
To top